This is the story of Judges claiming they can legitimately reject their official court record, the transcript and prefer the recollection of the Plaintiff to protect her lawyer committing fraud. The PM and the MOJ are ultimately accountable for the conduct of Judges.
This story is fairly text heavy but I’ve tried to make it accessible in substack articles describing my attempts to achieve accountability in our legal / political system for a documented failure in accountability throughout the Canadian legal system resulting in a constitutional crisis and a failure in the legitimacy of the Executive and a test for Parliament to protect Canadians from abuses of power by our elected and unelected officials.
International – Non Canadian Visitors
Information for ALL Canadians – stay on this page
Specific to British Columbia
Up close and Personal, my life in New Denver.
Specific to the matter of the seizure of the Ymir Backcountry Ski Lodge.
On 23rd April 2025 the Federal Court of Appeal accepted my filing in support of my intervener application in the hearing of the legality of the prorogation of Parliament. I had submitted my evidence to all of the Members of Parliament seeking accountability from the Prime Minister for his conduct improperly protecting Federal Judges. Trudeau prorogued Parliament in order to avoid the legitimate checks and balances on the conduct of the Executive and the Judiciary.
My recent letter to PM Mark Carney
To: Prime Minister | Premier Ministre <pm@pm.gc.ca>
March 26, 2025
Letter to the Office of the Prime Minister Mark Carney,
I am forwarding this letter [of September 11, 2024] which was written to every member of the House of Commons in support of a non-confidence motion in the Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Now that Justin Trudeau has stepped down and you have replaced him as leader of the Liberal Party and assumed the role of Prime Minister this duty becomes yours in order to protect Canadians and ensure that the constitutional imperative of peace, order and good government is maintained. The conduct alleged cannot be justified in a free and democratic State which is why there has been no argument presented by the Attorney General’s Office to defend their conduct.
I have presented the additional evidence before the BC Ombudsperson’s Office that the BC Law Society is protecting lawyers committing extortion and that the allegation was known to Minister of Justice David Lametti who made false and misleading statements to avoid doing his duty and improperly protecting lawyers and judges abusing Canadians. In addition the office of the PMO forwarded those details on to your current Chief of Staff Marco Mendocino who never responded. The evidence was presented before the court with a request for a writ of mandamus on the Minister of Justice with a decision due on Feb 14, 2022 when the judge failed to do her duty to even show up at the court house and the Emergencies Act was enforced.
I do not know if you were privy to this information although it appears that you were in communication at the time with Mendocino, Lametti and Trudeau according to the evidence presented at POEC. In light of this evidence the legal opinion presented by the Attorney General’s Office should be made public and you have the authority and duty to do that.
The evidence has also been presented before the Special Joint Committee into the Declaration of an Emergency and before the Federal Court of Appeal from the decision of Justice Mosely which stated that the conduct of the Executive was unreasonable, illegal and unconstitutional.
The further evidence indicates that the Minister of Justice’s conduct was not in good faith and was an abuse of the public trust, malfeasance in office. This is an election issue. Given the evidence can the Public trust your administration to do it’s duty? The conduct of using the legal system to intimidate your political opponents using fear and extortion to silence dissent is reprehensible in a purported democracy.
Oh Canada I stand on guard for thee.
On September 12, 2024 I submitted a conduct complaint to the Quebec Law Society regarding the former Minister of Justice David Lametti.
On September 9, 2024 I wrote a letter to all of the Parliamentarians supplying them with the argument and evidence to support a no-confidence motion in Justin Trudeau for failures in the administration of government.
On August 30, 2024 I wrote to all of the Members of the Legislative Assembly expressing my concern regarding the administration of justice in the province in particular the Attorney General’s office claiming that neither their office nor the legislature have any role in the judging of judicial conduct, a claim to be above the law.
On July 18, 2024 I submitted a judicial conduct complaint to the Canadian Judicial Council regarding the Judge who when requested a writ of mandamus on the Minister of Justice, a request for a court order for a Minister to do his duty, just didnt show up to Court to provide a decision and then claimed she was on holiday, whilst the Minister, David Lametti enforced the Emergencies Act upon Canadians
On April 4, 2024 the Federal Court of Appeal in Ottawa accepted my request to submit evidence to the Inquiry before the Court regarding the decision by the Federal Government to invoke the Emergencies Act.
The Federal AG wrote a letter requesting the court deny my request
These were my reasons why the evidence should be presented. This is the full pdf file
On Feb 14th 2022 a Lametti Liberal appointed Judge did not show up to Court to render a decision on the issuing of a Writ of Mandamus on the MOJ, to do his duty to protect the public and ensure that the administration of justice was in i compliance with the law. Instead the Emergencies Act was invoked.
https://ruleoflawcanada.substack.com/p/the-invocation-of-the-emergencies
On Dec 3rd 2021 I had presented Justice Lyster in the Nelson Supreme Court in British Columbia a failure in the rule of law through the entire legal system and requested accountability for their conduct to be presented to Parliament to ensure that the Judiciary was in compliance with the Constitution. My evidence established that it was not.
https://ruleoflawcanada.substack.com/p/constitutional-crisis-165
I had been attempting to communicate with the PMO and the MOJ for quite a while to inform them of the problem with a judiciary claiming they could ignore the transcript to protect a lawyer committing fraud. AG/MOJ David Lametti responded once but never again.
https://ruleoflawcanada.substack.com/p/communication-with-moj-and-pmo
My concern was that the guarantee of “fair and impartial” trials was not being provided to Canadians. Fraud and Corruption seemed to be out of control. Parliament, representing the people is the appropriate body to check the powers of the Judiciary.
My efforts to Communicate with the House of Commons
Failure of the MOJ to respond to s 24(1), the Enforcement Procedure of the Charter
Why I describe this as a Constitutional Crisis
On November 30, 2022 I communicated the problem with every Premier across Canada
I got no response. The Premiers office forwards it to their Minister of Justice who ignores it as if they are above the law and not subject to the law. It’s the way they think.
I presented the matter to the Court system through the most legitimate method I could discover in the historical precedents, the argument of no taxation without representation and the refusal to comply with the reporting requirements of the income tax act. In the BC Supreme Court they called my evidence “irrelevant” and in the BC Court of Appeal a “conspiracy theory…does not reflect reality”, eliminating my lived experience.
The mother of my children was also abusing me through the court system knowing the abuse I had suffered in my prior experience and attempting to abuse me again. The law is like that, a sword or a shield. I refused to voluntarily submit myself to that abuse and so the Judiciary arbitrarily imprisoned me.
Whilst incarcerated in attempted to access the Supreme Court of Canada to have the validity of the detention determined by way of habeas corpus s 10 c) and s 9 but they denied access to that Charter right.
This is part of the story of my incarceration as a political prisoner of the Judiciary.
I continued communicating with my member of Parliament and submitted this brief to the Parliamentary Committee on Justice and Human Rights as they were debating Bill C-40 The David Milgaard Miscarriage of Justice Act which David Lametti claimed was one his proudest achievements, probably after MAID and requesting a tank on the Canadian public.
The evidence was presented to the Public Order Emergency Inquiry but not a word of the problem was in the official report by Justice Rouleau. The Inquiry was an obstruction of justice. The conduct cannot be justified in a free and democratic state. The PM and MOJ know that Canadians are being abused in the legal system and fail to protect the public.
A failure to comply with the constitutional requirement of the rule of law, and Peace, Order and Good Government. It is a constitutional crisis. The claim of legitimacy of rule is a fraud.
“In the final analysis who is on the hook if a judge screws up? It is the Prime Minister and the Justice Minister”
Shaughnessy Cohen quoted by Mr. Paul Forseth
“Today we see the ultimate consequences of a completely unencumbered, unaccountable judiciary” Mr. Jason Kenney
That pretty much brings us up to date. Keep reading below if you want to get to all the full details, evidence, transcripts and lots more. I’m on twitter with updates at Fundamental Justice @ruleoflawcanada or email fundamentaljustice@gmail.com
Thanks for your support. Trying to make a better world for our children.
This is my previous front page
“Let no good deed go unpunished”
Canadian Court Reporter Christie Blatchford
Speaking Truth to Power.
Two pieces of evidence were intriguing in their implications:
The BC Law Society refused to discipline a lawyer who had not complied with a court order to produce monthly copies of a trust account and refused to justify their decision as required by statute by providing a written reason.
The Canadian Judicial Council claimed that Judges have discretion in their acceptance of the best evidence any Canadian could provide, their official record, the transcript. Discretion implies a choice between two or more legitimate choices. If there is only one legitimate decision it is a duty. The Council refused to comply with their own rules to seek independent counsel when a complaint was made about the conduct of a member of the Council and instead labelled it an abuse of process and have refused all subsequent communications including FOI requests.
This is the story of pulling those two pieces of evidence through the legal system, into the political system to achieve a better understanding of how law/politics/power is used and abused. The implications of these facts is that British Columbians specifically and Canadians in general have ZERO RIGHTS in our legal system, only privileges granted by the paying of legal fees to lawyers.
In the Justice system: including Law Societies, Police, Public Prosecution, Department of Justice and the Minister of Justice. When I reported the MOJ the RCMP wrote “do not send more evidence, we will not examine it, we will destroy…”
In the Court system: following the most valid method of protesting a corrupt administration, the withholding of the declaration of Income Tax. Following the documents through the Trials/Mistrials and Appeals. Divorce/Custody & child support Abuse. The Supreme Court of Canada refused to acknowledge a writ of habeas corpus in conflict with the Charter 10 c). Habeas Corpus is a judicial check on the legality of detention.
In the Political system: House of Commons, Ministers, Prime Minister, Parliamentary Committees, Senate, Governor General, Opposition Leaders. Petitions and Debates on Judges Act
The purpose is to bring about a conversation about Corruption in Canada, the harms that are caused, the propaganda that is used, and ideas for improving our systems in the public interest. This is my suggestion for judicial conduct reform
It’s an interesting story of Judicial Dictatorship and the timing coincided with the Storming of the Capitol Building in the United States, the #metoo #believeallwomen Depp v Heard Defamation Trial, International Covid Vaccine Lockdowns, The Truckers Freedom Convoy Occupation of Ottawa, The Emergencies Act Inquiry, Parliamentary debate on the Judges Act and the increasingly dictatorial conduct of the Liberal/Trudeau/Feminist/Court Party.
In the evidence I could see the threat to human rights, justice, the rule of law, democracy and my own personal physical and mental integrity. Armed with my innocence in its many forms, the Charter of Rights, and parents that had instilled in me the importance of doing the right thing.
I had spent most of my life engaged in guiding others through the mountains requiring extensive experience, confidence, capacity for exposure and constant risk evaluation.
“I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived.”
Henry David Thoreau
Fortunately I also had begun reading on Buddhism to support me on my path, grounded in the acceptance of suffering and the noble eightfold path of right view, intention, speech, action, livelihood, effort, mindfulness and concentration. I stray and return. I am a human being. I hope that my work will be of use to someone.
Enjoy the journey.
“God, Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.”
Trevor Holsworth
“Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.”
Robert Frost
Ymir Backcountry Ski Lodge.
For the issue in relation to the specific issue of the government seizing my last remaining “asset”, the Ymir backcountry ski lodge.
https://ruleoflawcanada.substack.com/p/siezing-the-ymir-backcountry-ski
click here to link to the Twitter feed on the issue
My Substack Posts
The Invocation of the Emergencies Act – how my protest combined with the covid/freedom convoy and evidence removed from POEC.
My efforts to Communicate with the House of Commons
Failure of the MOJ to respond to s 24(1), the Enforcement Procedure of the Charter
Participatory Democracy – Who wants it?
Judicial Abuse of Power – My initial protest statement in the Valley Voice July 1st 2021
My initial argument to petition House of Commons
“Fascism begins the moment a ruling class, fearing the people may use their political democracy to gain economic democracy, begins to destroy political democracy in order to retain its power of exploitation and special privilege.”
Tommy Douglas