The CJC claims in this letter that Judges can disregard the transcript and can prefer to call upon the Plaintiff, and request that she commit perjury to protect her lawyer committing fraud, and that is acceptable conduct for a judge in Canada. Judge Shaw
I requested that the matter be reviewed but they rejected that so ultimately I requested that the Judge who requested Norman Sabourin write the dismissal letter be brought before Parliament to explain his decision. That request Mr Sabourin labelled an “abuse of process”
Despite the CJC claiming to be transparent and accountable. In accordance with generally accepted legal practice, the practice in reality is contrary to the written statement.
“All documents and other types of information received and collected during the processing of complaints as per the Canadian Judicial Council Procedures for the Review of Complaints or Allegations About Federally Appointed Judges are confidential. It is important to note that, in regard to the disclosure of such documents and other types of information, as well as personal documents and information included in the files of employees, the Canadian Judicial Council is not a government institution listed in schedule 1 of the Access to Information Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. A-1) nor in schedule 1 of the Privacy Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. P-21).
Accordingly, your request for disclosure of documents is denied.
Yours sincerely,
Jacqueline Corado
Acting Executive Director“